{"id":16402,"date":"2025-06-27T16:53:04","date_gmt":"2025-06-27T14:53:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/phoebusfoundation.org\/phoebus_findings\/dissecting-an-antwerp-surgeons-botanical-manuscript\/"},"modified":"2025-06-30T14:29:36","modified_gmt":"2025-06-30T12:29:36","slug":"11","status":"publish","type":"phoebus_findings","link":"https:\/\/phoebusfoundation.org\/en\/phoebus_findings\/11\/","title":{"rendered":"Dissecting an Antwerp Surgeon\u2019s Botanical Manuscript"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Dr Leen Kelchtermans<\/p>\n\n

Recently, an extraordinary, anonymous eighteenth-century botanical manuscript was meticulously restored at The Phoebus Foundation\u2019s paper conservation studio.1<\/a><\/sup> The handwritten compendium consists of two alphabetically arranged parts. The first is preceded by a hand-coloured title page from the famous Cru\u00ffde Boeck<\/em> (\u2018Herbal\u2019) by the sixteenth-century physician from Mechelen, Rembert Dodoens. The title and other details were cut away and replaced with an image of a spina arabica. The second part opens with a depiction of a woman towering above a closed gate and an elegant cartouche featuring the coat of arms of Amsterdam, along with the initials \u2018F.H.\u2019 and intertwined \u2018DC\u2019. Each plant is accompanied by a description, including details on taste and medicinal applications. Additionally, every entry features an illustration: the author carefully coloured, meticulously cut out, and attached images from Dodoens\u2019 publication.<\/p>\n\n

During the restoration, a surprise emerged: a folded piece of paper hidden within the parchment spine. What was written on it, and what does it reveal about the author of this extraordinary manuscript?<\/p>\n\n

\n
\n
\"\"
Title page of the first plant series<\/em>, in: Attributed to Petrus Josephus Van Laere, Botanical Manuscript with Illustrations From Dodoens\u2019 Cru\u00ffde Boeck<\/em>, c.<\/em>1771-1782. Antwerp, The Phoebus Foundation<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\"\"
Title Page<\/em>, of: Rembert Dodoens, Cru\u00ffde boeck<\/em>, 1563. Antwerp, The Phoebus Foundation<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\"\"
Title page of the second plant series<\/em>, in: Attributed to Petrus Josephus Van Laere, Botanical Manuscript with Illustrations From Dodoens\u2019 Cru\u00ffde Boeck<\/em>, c.<\/em>1771-1782. Antwerp, The Phoebus Foundation<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n
\"\"
Copy of the baptismal record of Petrus Josephus Van Laere, found in the spine of the Botanical Manuscript<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n

Antwerp Surgeon<\/strong><\/p>\n\n

The piece of paper found in the spine of the botanical manuscript turned out to be a Latin copy of a baptismal record, written by the assistant priest of the Antwerp parish of Saint Andrew on 20 October 1762. It refers to the baptism of Petrus Josephus Van Laere, son of Carolus Van Laere and Elizabetha Van Duren. The copy exactly matches the original note in the corresponding baptismal register: Petrus Josephus was indeed baptised on 8 June 1746, at Saint Andrew\u2019s parish. His parents had married in the same church five months earlier, on 5 January 1746, suggesting that Elizabetha was already four months pregnant at the time.2<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n\n

At the age of twenty-four, on 30 June 1770, Petrus Josephus Van Laere married Maria Isabella Rottiers from Antwerp\u2019s Saint James parish.3<\/a><\/sup> A document from the Orphan Chamber archive dated 5 September of that same year reveals his parents died before he reached majority. It lists Van Laere\u2019s expenses from 1764 as part of an inheritance settlement. Among costs listed for clothing, shoes, silver buckles, and a razor, the sharpening of lancets particularly stands out, as these were surgical instruments. He also purchased \u2018two books concerning surgery\u2019 from the bookseller Grang\u00e9, clearly indicating Van Laere\u2019s activities within the Antwerp surgical community.4<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n\n

These activities are further confirmed by the Account Book of Antwerp Surgeons, where Van Laere is mentioned several times as a fellow (\u2018confrater<\/em>\u2019) or master surgeon. Between 10 July 1772, and 7 May 1776, he paid 160 guilders in guild fees and 10 guilders to register an apprentice. This likely took place around 13 December 1774, when Van Laere obtained his diploma but still faced an eight-year apprenticeship.5<\/a><\/sup> Once this apprenticeship ended, in 1782, his membership was again recorded in the Account Book, and in January 1787 another apprentice, Arnoldus Proestmans, was registered.6<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n\n

Van Laere continued his surgical practice thereafter. During the Antwerp census of 1796, he was recorded as residing in the \u2018chambre haute<\/em>\u2019 at \u2018Rue de Convent 12<\/em>\u2019: \u2018Pierre Vanlaere, 50,<\/em> Churigijn<\/em> [sic]\u2019 lived there with his wife and two unmarried daughters, Johanna Maria Isabella and Maria Carolina.7<\/a><\/sup> Nearly twenty years later, Van Laere died on 1 February 1815, as recorded in the surgeon\u2019s obituary in the Antwerpsche Gazette<\/em>.8<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n\n

Now that the baptised individual named on the folded piece of paper hidden in the spine of the botanical manuscript has been identified as the Antwerp surgeon Petrus Josephus Van Laere, a question arises: could he also be the author of this work? The presence of the note makes it highly likely. Moreover, an analysis of the compendium\u2019s contents and its dating further supports this hypothesis.<\/p>\n\n

\n
\n
\"\"
Palma, panicum, and various species of poppy<\/em>, in: Attributed to Petrus Josephus Van Laere, Botanical Manuscript with Illustrations From Dodoens\u2019 Cru\u00ffde Boeck<\/em>, c.<\/em>1771-1782. Antwerp, The Phoebus Foundation<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\"\"
Common poppy<\/em>, in: Attributed to Petrus Josephus Van Laere, Botanical Manuscript with Illustrations From Dodoens\u2019 Cru\u00ffde Boeck<\/em>, c.<\/em>1771-1782. Antwerp, The Phoebus Foundation<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\"\"
Common poppy<\/em>, in: Rembert Dodoens, Cru\u00ffde Boeck<\/em>, 1563. Antwerp, The Phoebus Foundation<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n

Reuse<\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Before proceeding further, it is necessary to say something about the manuscript itself. It strongly appears that it was not originally intended as a notebook. The two vertical red lines on the left and four on the right of each page suggest that the manuscript was intended as an account book for recording sums of money according to coin type. This is supported by an inscription on the front endpaper, in handwriting notably older than that of the manuscript itself. It reads: \u2018Groot Boeck gheregelt voor<\/em> [blank]\u2019. This term explicitly refers to a commercial ledger in which merchants recorded their transactions.9<\/a><\/sup> The name of the individual for whom the book was \u2018gheregelt<\/em>\u2019 or provided with columns was never filled in.10<\/a><\/sup> Later, the endpaper was glued to the cover, obscuring the inscription. Possibly, the author of the botanical manuscript did this himself, as he did not use the book for accounting purposes. Nor did he pay attention to the columns: he simply wrote over them or pasted illustrations on top.<\/p>\n\n

\n
\n
\"\"
Various species of geraniums, glastis and gallium<\/em>, in: Attributed to Petrus Josephus Van Laere, Botanical Manuscript with Illustrations From Dodoens\u2019 Cru\u00ffde Boeck<\/em>, c.<\/em>1771-1782. Antwerp, The Phoebus Foundation<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\"\"
Front endpaper with inscription<\/em>, in: Attributed to Petrus Josephus Van Laere, Botanical Manuscript with Illustrations From Dodoens\u2019 Cru\u00ffde Boeck<\/em>, c.<\/em>1771-1782. Antwerp, The Phoebus Foundation<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n

Specialist<\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Although the author of the botanical manuscript used illustrations from Dodoens\u2019 Cru\u00ffde Boeck<\/em>, he did not copy the texts from the doctor from Mechelen. Instead, for each plant, he noted medicinal properties and compared observations from various authors. He cited renowned authorities such as the Greek-Roman physician Claudius Galen (c.<\/em>129-216), sixteenth-century physician-botanists including the French Matthias de Lobel and Jacques Dal\u00e9champs, and seventeenth-century medical scholars such as the Dane Simon Paulli and the Englishman Thomas Sydenham.<\/p>\n\n

However, the author most frequently referred to scientists from the early eighteenth century. Carolus Linnaeus, who published the first edition of his botanical standard work Species Plantarum<\/em> in Stockholm in 1753, is mentioned multiple times, as is Giovanni Alessandro Brambilla, Emperor Joseph II\u2019s Italian personal physician, who released his influential Riflessione fisico-medico-chirurgiche<\/em> in 1769. The author often compared the medicinal applications of plants with the \u2018London\u2019 and \u2018Edinburgh materia medica\u2019 (\u2018Londesche<\/em>\u2019 and \u2018Edenborghse materia medica<\/em>\u2019). The latter was established when Francis Home became the first professor of Materia Medica at the Scottish university in 1768, holding the position for thirty years.11<\/a><\/sup> Additionally, he occasionally copied entire excerpts from Materia Chirurgica<\/em> by the Viennese physician Joseph Jacob von Plenck, first published in 1771.<\/p>\n\n

Dating<\/strong><\/p>\n\n

When the botanical manuscript entered The Phoebus Foundation\u2019s collection, it was assumed to date from the early eighteenth century, as the paper bears a watermark from 1722.12<\/a><\/sup> However, this dating can be further refined based on the scientific reference works cited by the author. Indeed, the publication dates of their first editions provide a terminus post quem<\/em> for the manuscript, definitively placing it after 1771 \u2013 the year Von Plenck\u2019s Materia Chirurgica<\/em> was first issued.<\/p>\n\n

This dating also aligns with a note at the front of the manuscript: \u2018ontfanghe van de Heer Kramp de somme van 73<\/em> [guilders]-10 stuyvers den 2<\/em>[illegible digit] februarien 1782<\/em>\u2019 (\u2018received from Mr. Kramp the sum of 73 guilders and 10 stuivers<\/em> on 2[?] February, 1782\u2019). It appears the book was already in use by then \u2013 1782 was also the year in which Van Laere\u2019s surgical apprenticeship was fully completed. Another note at the back states: \u2018Catharina is bij de heer <\/em>[illegible name] comen wonen den 21 augusti 1764<\/em>\u2019 (\u2018Catharina came to live with Mr. [?] on 21 August 1764\u2019). How exactly to interpret these notes remains unclear.<\/p>\n\n

\"\"
Various species of valeriana<\/em>, in: Attributed to Petrus Josephus Van Laere, Botanical Manuscript with Illustrations From Dodoens\u2019 Cru\u00ffde Boeck<\/em>, c.<\/em>1771-1782. Antwerp, The Phoebus Foundation<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n

Van Laere\u2019s Compendium?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Alongside the copy of his baptismal record hidden in the manuscript\u2019s spine, the adjusted dating \u2013 after 1771 \u2013 strongly suggests Petrus Josephus Van Laere as the author. Indeed, he was active as a certified surgeon in Antwerp between 1774 and 1815. The author of the botanical manuscript was clearly no novice, but an experienced specialist, as evidenced by annotations containing detailed personal medical observations, such as \u2018with the wine, in which rue had been boiled, and a bit of rose honey added, I healed a foul-smelling nasal ulcer and a rotten, ulcerous inflammation of the gums accompanied by decay of the jawbone.\u2019 Furthermore, the remedy prepared from the mastic tree would not prevent the suppuration of head wounds, \u2018as I myself have observed\u2019, and regarding flaxseed he noted: \u2018I have repeatedly found a paste made from flaxseed meal mixed with milk and powdered hemlock herb to be the best remedy when applied to breasts that were partly hardened, partly inflamed, and partly suppurating.\u2019 Additionally, in connection with the sale of a specific type of valerian in \u2018the shops\u2019, he referred to \u2018our College\u2019.13<\/a><\/sup> Could he mean the Collegium Medicum Antverpiense? It was established in 1620 to ensure the quality of surgical training in the city on the Scheldt and, among other things, also regulated the sale of medicines by pharmacists.14<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n\n

Despite minor differences here and there, the botanical manuscript appears to have been consistently written by a single individual. A comparison between its handwriting and Van Laere\u2019s signatures on various documents, such as his children\u2019s baptismal records and the 1774 notarial deeds concerning his wife\u2019s inheritance, further supports his authorship.15<\/a><\/sup> The formation of letters, such as the capital \u2018V\u2019 and \u2018L\u2019, and the lowercase \u2018p\u2019, \u2018r\u2019, and \u2018v\u2019, is notably similar. In short, the hidden copy of his baptismal record, along with the dating and contents, the matching biographical data, and the similar handwriting, collectively constitute compelling evidence for attributing the botanical manuscript to the Antwerp surgeon Petrus Josephus Van Laere.<\/p>\n\n

\n
\n
\"\"
Signature of Petrus Josephus Van Laere on the baptismal record of his daughter Lucia Maria. Antwerp, Felix Archief<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\"\"
Signature of Petrus Josephus Van Laere on a notarial deed dated 12 July 1774. Beveren, State Archives<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n

Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>\n\n

While the botanical manuscript already impressed due to its meticulous composition, the discovery of the copy of the baptismal record hidden in the parchment spine made it even more intriguing. It very likely is the reference work that Antwerp surgeon Petrus Josephus Van Laere carefully wrote in the last quarter of the eighteenth century. He devoted considerable attention to precisely colouring, cutting out, and pasting Dodoens\u2019 prints, as well as recording his medical observations. His extensive study and comparison of medical and botanical sources from various centuries and regions reflect his dedication and thorough expertise. It strikingly illustrates the professionalization of medicine during that period, also in Antwerp, where the Collegium Medicum had already been operational for over a century. The compendium thus forms a valuable historical document. Thanks to a piece of paper hidden for centuries in the spine, we gain a rare insight into what likely were the study and doctor\u2019s office of surgeon Van Laere, and consequently, the medical landscape of his time.<\/p>\n\n

\"\"
The Surgeon<\/em>, in: Jan and Caspar Luyken, Spiegel van\u2019t Menschelyk Bedryf<\/em>, 1694. Antwerp, The Phoebus Foundation<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n
<\/div>\n\n

How to cite this item? \n<\/strong>Kelchtermans, \u2018Dissecting an Antwerp Surgeon\u2019s Botanical Manuscript\u2019, Phoebus Findings<\/em>, https:\/\/phoebusfoundation.org\/en\/phoebus_findings\/11\/, accessed on [dd.mm.yyyy].All rights reserved. No part of this\u00a0Phoebus Finding<\/em>\u00a0may be reproduced, stored in an information storage and retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, whether electronic or mechanical, including copying, recording or otherwise, without prior permission in writing from The Phoebus Foundation. If you have comments or want to make use of our images, we\u2019d like to hear from you. Contact us at: info@phoebusfoundation.org<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Footnotes<\/h2><\/div>
  1. See https:\/\/phoebusfoundation.org\/beleef\/de-restauratie-van-een-18de-eeuws-plantenboek\/<\/a>.[↩<\/a>]<\/span><\/li>
  2. Antwerp, Felix Archief (AFA), Parish Records (Parochieregisters), Saint Andrew\u2019s Church, Baptisms, PR#111, fol. 207r; Idem, Saint Andrew\u2019s Church, Marriages, PR#248, fol. 22r.[↩<\/a>]<\/span><\/li>
  3. AFA, Parish Records (Parochieregisters), Church of Our Lady North, Marriages, PR#208, fol. 149v.[↩<\/a>]<\/span><\/li>
  4. \u2018twee Boecken raeckende de Chirurgie\u2019, see AFA, Orphan Chamber Archive (Weeskamer), Individual Files, WK#3208, n.p.[↩<\/a>]<\/span><\/li>
  5. A. De Mets, La Corporation des Chirurgiens-barbiers d\u2019Anvers et l\u2019Enseignement de la Chirurgie \u00e0 Anvers, depuis la fin du moyen-\u00e2ge jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la r\u00e9volution fran\u00e7aise<\/em>, Antwerp, 1921: 20.[↩<\/a>]<\/span><\/li>
  6. AFA, Guilds and Trades (Gilden en Ambachten), Barbers and Surgeons, GA#4079, fol. 18r, 22v, 30v.[↩<\/a>]<\/span><\/li>
  7. AFA, Civil Registration and Population (Burgerlijke stand en bevolking), Census of Year IV (1796), inv. 2932#49. For the baptismal records of these daughters, see AFA, Parish Records (Parochieregisters), Saint Walburga\u2019s Church, Baptisms, PR#87, fol. 182r (27 March 1775) and fol. 224r (14 December 1776). The couple had eight children. In addition to the daughters already mentioned, there were also: Petrus Josephus (Antwerp, 19 February 1771), Maria Elisabetha (Essen, 31 January 1773), Henricus Josephus (Antwerp, 18 June 1779), Lucia Maria (Antwerp, 21 January 1782), Maria Josepha (Antwerp, 10 May 1784) and Joannes Josephus (Antwerp, 11 February 1786). For their baptismal records, see AFA, Parish Records (Parochieregisters), Church of Our Lady North, Baptisms, PR#41, fol. 12v; Agatha. The Online Search Environment of the State Archives of Belgium<\/em>: Essen, Nativity of Our Lady Church, Baptisms, fol. 918v, https:\/\/agatha.arch.be\/data\/images\/511\/511_0001_037_00008_000\/0_0919_r<\/a>, accessed on 30.05.2025; ARA, Parish Records (Parochieregisters), Saint Walburga\u2019s Church, Baptisms, PR#88, fol. 64r and 151v; Idem, PR#89, fol. 17r and 88r.[↩<\/a>]<\/span><\/li>
  8. Family Search<\/em>, Civil Registration and Population (Burgerlijke stand en bevolking), District Antwerp, Deaths 1814-1815, no. 190, https:\/\/www.familysearch.org\/ark:\/61903\/3:1:S3HY-6W3S-1YQ?wc=Q82R-T18%3A1007785401%2C1007864101%26cc%3D2138481&lang=en&i=478<\/a>, accessed on 30.05.2025; Antwerpsche Gazette<\/em>, 16 (7 February 1815): 4.[↩<\/a>]<\/span><\/li>
  9. See the entry \u2018grootboek\u2019 in the Ge\u00efntegreerde taalbank, https:\/\/gtb.ivdnt.org\/iWDB\/search?actie=article&wdb=WNT&id=M022359&lemma=grootboek&domein=0&conc=true<\/a>, accessed on 30.05.2025.[↩<\/a>]<\/span><\/li>
  10. See the entry \u2018regelen\u2019, meaning \u2018to draw lines with a ruler\u2019 in the Ge\u00efntegreerde taalbank, https:\/\/gtb.ivdnt.org\/iWDB\/search?actie=article&wdb=WNT&id=M058235&lemma=regelen&domein=0&conc=true<\/a>, accessed on 30.05.2025.[↩<\/a>]<\/span><\/li>
  11. J.H. Gaddum, \u2018The Development of Materia Medica in Edinburgh\u2019, Edinburgh Medical Journal<\/em> (December 1942): 721-722.[↩<\/a>]<\/span><\/li>
  12. London, Sotheby\u2019s, 13.12.2022, lot 189.[↩<\/a>]<\/span><\/li>
  13. Original quotations: \u2018Ick genas met den wijn, daer wijnruijt in gekockt, en wat roosenhoning bij gedaen was, een stinckende neussweer, en een haetelijcke rottige versweering van het tantvlees, die met been bederf der tantkas gepaert ging\u2019, \u2018als ik selver heb waergenomen\u2019, \u2018Ick hebbe menighmael het lijnsaetmeel met melck en scheerlingkruijd tot poeder gebraght, als een pap op op [sic] borsten, die half verhaerdt, half ontsteeken en half verteert waeren en verettert waeren, uijt alle middelen het beste bevonden\u2019, \u2018de winckels\u2019 en \u2018ons Collegie\u2019.[↩<\/a>]<\/span><\/li>
  14. R. Van Hee, \u2018Surgeons and the Collegium Medicum Antverpiense: Professionalisation of Surgical Practice in 17th<\/sup> Century Antwerp\u2019, Acta Chirurgica Belgica<\/em>, 111 (2011): 184-191.[↩<\/a>]<\/span><\/li>
  15. Beveren, State Archives, Notary Essen (Notariaat Essen), Notary Sonnius, dated 09.04.1774 and 12.07.1774.[↩<\/a>]<\/span><\/li><\/ol>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Recently, an extraordinary, anonymous eighteenth-century botanical manuscript was meticulously restored at The Phoebus Foundation\u2019s paper conservation studio. The handwritten compendium consists of two alphabetically arranged parts. The first is preceded by a hand-coloured title page from the famous Cru\u00ffde Boeck (\u2018Herbal\u2019) by the sixteenth-century physician from Mechelen, Rembert Dodoens. The title and other details were cut away and replaced with an image of a spina arabica. The second part opens with a depiction of a woman towering above a closed gate and an elegant cartouche featuring the coat of arms of Amsterdam, along with the initials \u2018F.H.\u2019 and intertwined \u2018DC\u2019. Each plant is accompanied by a description, including details on taste and medicinal applications. Additionally, every entry features an illustration: the author carefully coloured, meticulously cut out, and attached images from Dodoens\u2019 publication.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":19219,"template":"","soort_artikel":[],"class_list":["post-16402","phoebus_findings","type-phoebus_findings","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nDissecting an Antwerp Surgeon\u2019s Botanical Manuscript - The Phoebus Foundation<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/phoebusfoundation.org\/en\/phoebus_findings\/11\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Dissecting an Antwerp Surgeon\u2019s Botanical Manuscript - The Phoebus Foundation\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Recently, an extraordinary, anonymous eighteenth-century botanical manuscript was meticulously restored at The Phoebus Foundation\u2019s paper conservation studio. The handwritten compendium consists of two alphabetically arranged parts. The first is preceded by a hand-coloured title page from the famous Cru\u00ffde Boeck (\u2018Herbal\u2019) by the sixteenth-century physician from Mechelen, Rembert Dodoens. The title and other details were cut away and replaced with an image of a spina arabica. The second part opens with a depiction of a woman towering above a closed gate and an elegant cartouche featuring the coat of arms of Amsterdam, along with the initials \u2018F.H.\u2019 and intertwined \u2018DC\u2019. Each plant is accompanied by a description, including details on taste and medicinal applications. Additionally, every entry features an illustration: the author carefully coloured, meticulously cut out, and attached images from Dodoens\u2019 publication.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/phoebusfoundation.org\/en\/phoebus_findings\/11\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Phoebus Foundation\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ThePhoebusFoundation\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-06-30T12:29:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/phoebusfoundation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/afb.-4.-Afschrift-doopakte-scaled.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2452\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"16 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/phoebusfoundation.org\\\/en\\\/phoebus_findings\\\/11\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/phoebusfoundation.org\\\/en\\\/phoebus_findings\\\/11\\\/\",\"name\":\"Dissecting an Antwerp Surgeon\u2019s Botanical Manuscript - The Phoebus Foundation\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/phoebusfoundation.org\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/phoebusfoundation.org\\\/en\\\/phoebus_findings\\\/11\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/phoebusfoundation.org\\\/en\\\/phoebus_findings\\\/11\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/phoebusfoundation.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/afb.-1.-Botanisch-manuscript-Titelpagina-deel-1-scaled.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-06-27T14:53:04+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-06-30T12:29:36+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/phoebusfoundation.org\\\/en\\\/phoebus_findings\\\/11\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/phoebusfoundation.org\\\/en\\\/phoebus_findings\\\/11\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/phoebusfoundation.org\\\/en\\\/phoebus_findings\\\/11\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/phoebusfoundation.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/afb.-1.-Botanisch-manuscript-Titelpagina-deel-1-scaled.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/phoebusfoundation.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/afb.-1.-Botanisch-manuscript-Titelpagina-deel-1-scaled.jpg\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":992},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/phoebusfoundation.org\\\/en\\\/phoebus_findings\\\/11\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/phoebusfoundation.org\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Dissecting an Antwerp Surgeon\u2019s Botanical Manuscript\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/phoebusfoundation.org\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/phoebusfoundation.org\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"The Phoebus Foundation\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/phoebusfoundation.org\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/phoebusfoundation.org\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/phoebusfoundation.org\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"The Phoebus Foundation\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/phoebusfoundation.org\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/phoebusfoundation.org\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/phoebusfoundation.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/03\\\/The-phoebus-foundation_logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/phoebusfoundation.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/03\\\/The-phoebus-foundation_logo.png\",\"width\":800,\"height\":828,\"caption\":\"The Phoebus Foundation\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/phoebusfoundation.org\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/ThePhoebusFoundation\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/thephoebusfoundation\\\/\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Dissecting an Antwerp Surgeon\u2019s Botanical Manuscript - The Phoebus Foundation","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/phoebusfoundation.org\/en\/phoebus_findings\/11\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Dissecting an Antwerp Surgeon\u2019s Botanical Manuscript - The Phoebus Foundation","og_description":"Recently, an extraordinary, anonymous eighteenth-century botanical manuscript was meticulously restored at The Phoebus Foundation\u2019s paper conservation studio. The handwritten compendium consists of two alphabetically arranged parts. The first is preceded by a hand-coloured title page from the famous Cru\u00ffde Boeck (\u2018Herbal\u2019) by the sixteenth-century physician from Mechelen, Rembert Dodoens. The title and other details were cut away and replaced with an image of a spina arabica. The second part opens with a depiction of a woman towering above a closed gate and an elegant cartouche featuring the coat of arms of Amsterdam, along with the initials \u2018F.H.\u2019 and intertwined \u2018DC\u2019. Each plant is accompanied by a description, including details on taste and medicinal applications. Additionally, every entry features an illustration: the author carefully coloured, meticulously cut out, and attached images from Dodoens\u2019 publication.","og_url":"https:\/\/phoebusfoundation.org\/en\/phoebus_findings\/11\/","og_site_name":"The Phoebus Foundation","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ThePhoebusFoundation","article_modified_time":"2025-06-30T12:29:36+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2452,"height":2560,"url":"https:\/\/phoebusfoundation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/afb.-4.-Afschrift-doopakte-scaled.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"16 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/phoebusfoundation.org\/en\/phoebus_findings\/11\/","url":"https:\/\/phoebusfoundation.org\/en\/phoebus_findings\/11\/","name":"Dissecting an Antwerp Surgeon\u2019s Botanical Manuscript - The Phoebus Foundation","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/phoebusfoundation.org\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/phoebusfoundation.org\/en\/phoebus_findings\/11\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/phoebusfoundation.org\/en\/phoebus_findings\/11\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/phoebusfoundation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/afb.-1.-Botanisch-manuscript-Titelpagina-deel-1-scaled.jpg","datePublished":"2025-06-27T14:53:04+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-30T12:29:36+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/phoebusfoundation.org\/en\/phoebus_findings\/11\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/phoebusfoundation.org\/en\/phoebus_findings\/11\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/phoebusfoundation.org\/en\/phoebus_findings\/11\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/phoebusfoundation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/afb.-1.-Botanisch-manuscript-Titelpagina-deel-1-scaled.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/phoebusfoundation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/afb.-1.-Botanisch-manuscript-Titelpagina-deel-1-scaled.jpg","width":2560,"height":992},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/phoebusfoundation.org\/en\/phoebus_findings\/11\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/phoebusfoundation.org\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Dissecting an Antwerp Surgeon\u2019s Botanical Manuscript"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/phoebusfoundation.org\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/phoebusfoundation.org\/en\/","name":"The Phoebus Foundation","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/phoebusfoundation.org\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/phoebusfoundation.org\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/phoebusfoundation.org\/en\/#organization","name":"The Phoebus Foundation","url":"https:\/\/phoebusfoundation.org\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/phoebusfoundation.org\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/phoebusfoundation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/The-phoebus-foundation_logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/phoebusfoundation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/The-phoebus-foundation_logo.png","width":800,"height":828,"caption":"The Phoebus Foundation"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/phoebusfoundation.org\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ThePhoebusFoundation","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/thephoebusfoundation\/"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/phoebusfoundation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/phoebus_findings\/16402","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/phoebusfoundation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/phoebus_findings"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/phoebusfoundation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/phoebus_findings"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/phoebusfoundation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/phoebus_findings\/16402\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16403,"href":"https:\/\/phoebusfoundation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/phoebus_findings\/16402\/revisions\/16403"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/phoebusfoundation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/19219"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/phoebusfoundation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16402"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"soort_artikel","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/phoebusfoundation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/soort_artikel?post=16402"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}